S.F. supervisors want tax breaks for developers turning downtown offices into housing

Lets use tax money to help developers turn offices into housing units.  Why?  If they believe in the project, why do they want the taxpayers to take the risk—while, if it succeeds, they get the profits.  They do not have to return the tax dollars spent so they can get rich.

“The resolution would create a special district spanning the Financial District, SoMa, and parts of Market Street that includes at least 49 commercial properties that could be converted, said Jacob Bintliff, the manager of economic recovery initiatives for the Office of Economic and Workforce Development, which is spearheading the effort. 

Converting all of the properties would add some 4,400 new units, which could generate up to $15.2 million in extra property taxes for the city. But that money would be disbursed back to developers, rather than going into the city’s general fund. It represents less than one percent of the nearly $2.5 billion the city is projected to receive in property taxes this fiscal year.

That is $15 million NOT going to schools, roads, public safety.  That means taxes have to go up or services cut, so the rich can make a profit.  Expect different when the Mayor is very rich, as are his friends and donors?  Corruption, San Fran style.

S.F. supervisors want tax breaks for developers turning downtown offices into housing

by Margaret Kadifa, Mission Local,  5/21/25    https://missionlocal.org/2025/05/sf-tax-breaks-downtown-office-conversion/

Three San Francisco supervisors on the Budget and Finance Committee unanimously approved a resolution Wednesday that, if the entire board approves, would return property taxes to downtown developers who retrofit old offices into housing. 

The rationale for the giveback is that turning offices into housing is expensive, and this would help developers recoup those costs.

The resolution would create a special district spanning the Financial District, SoMa, and parts of Market Street that includes at least 49 commercial properties that could be converted, said Jacob Bintliff, the manager of economic recovery initiatives for the Office of Economic and Workforce Development, which is spearheading the effort. 

Converting all of the properties would add some 4,400 new units, which could generate up to $15.2 million in extra property taxes for the city. But that money would be disbursed back to developers, rather than going into the city’s general fund. It represents less than one percent of the nearly $2.5 billion the city is projected to receive in property taxes this fiscal year.

The full Board of Supervisors will likely vote this fall on whether to create the special district.

This resolution follows other incentives recently created by voters and the city to spur investment in the city’s flagging downtown. In November, voters passed Proposition C to waive transfer taxes for office-to-housing conversions. The Board of Supervisors also approved an ordinance in March that waived affordable housing fees for office-to-housing conversions downtown.

But the resolution approved today “is the last piece of the puzzle,” Marc Babsin, the president of the Emerald Fund, a San Francisco-based real estate developer, said during the meeting Wednesday. “We will actually start to see conversions in Downtown and activation in Downtown.” 

In 2015, the Emerald Fund turned the former headquarters of the California Automobile Association at 100 Van Ness Ave. into 418 apartments. 

Architects say turning offices into homes is expensive. Plumbing has to be rerouted from communal bathrooms to single units. Floor plans of office buildings can be tough to rework in a way that allows enough natural light for a living space.

District 1 Supervisor Connie Chan, who ultimately voted for the resolution, did so after first balking at the extent of incentives going to developers. 

The city, she said at the Wednesday meeting, is “giving a lot already.”

The city is giving a lot, while facing a $781.5 million deficit. The administrative costs of managing this special district will need to be added to the city’s budget for next year, Bintliff said. However, state law lets the city recoup these costs. 

Mayor Daniel Lurie will present a draft budget to the Board of Supervisors on June 1.

This isn’t the first time San Francisco has offered tax breaks to try to revive parts of downtown. After the 2008 financial crisis, the city tried to revive the mid-Market area by giving a payroll tax break to some tech companies. Known as the “Twitter tax break,” because it was put in place after Twitter threatened to leave town, it had mixed results. 

Blight is still a problem in mid-Market, so much so that it’s included in the proposed new zone. Twitter, now X, gutted its workforce, and then moved to Texas anyway.