California Legislature Considering Early Parole for Murderers and Rapists

The Sacramento Democrats are not finished creating a crime wave in California.  One third of those given early release from prison, based on the COVID scam, went back to prison for new crimes.  Now the Legislative Democrats do not think we have enough rapists and murderers on the streets of California.

“Assembly Member Ash Kalra is wringing his hands over the murderers and rapists being deprived of their early releases. If he cares anything at all about the victims and their families, he hasn’t shown it. So he took an unrelated bill about prison visitation, amended out all its text, and substituted language that would authorize CDCR to move up MEPDs this way.

The Assembly Public Safety Committee is heavily stacked with soft-on-crime members, but even so this bill just squeaked out with the bare minimum number of votes: 5 on a 9-member committee. The bill was set for its third reading last Monday, the last step before it can be voted on by the full Assembly. It didn’t happen, though, and yesterday the bill received a trivial amendment having to do with evidence in parole hearings.

What’s up with that? This late, trivial amendment creates an exception to the usual June 9 deadline for a bill to pass its house of origin. Perhaps Mr. Kalra is having trouble getting enough votes and is stalling to give himself more time.”

Feel safe?  Not if you live or visit California.

California Legislature Considering Early Parole for Murderers and Rapists

by Kent Scheidegger, California Legal Justice Foundation,  5/23/25    https://www.crimeandconsequences.blog/?p=11410

The California Legislature is considering moving up parole hearings and releases for murderers and rapists. The proponents of this change may be having some difficulty rounding up the votes, and they have employed a legislative trick to buy more time. People with sense need to use this time to tell their representatives to vote down this atrocity instead.

In California, sentences of X-to-life (as opposed to a set term of years) are generally reserved for the very worst criminals. Murderers make up the lion’s share of inmates with these “indeterminate sentences.” Most second-degree murders draw a sentence of 15-to-life, and first-degree murder without special circumstances draws 25-to-life. Some repeated or exceptionally heinous sex crimes also draw similar sentences. The Three Strikes Law — which was substantially narrowed in an initiative in 2012 — also provides an indeterminate sentence for the third conviction of felonies from lists designated “serious” or “violent,” but these lists are considerably narrower than their names imply. Assault with a deadly weapon is not on the “violent” list, for example.

Before 2016, all of the minimums above were real minimums. Credits for good behavior or program participation could shorten fixed-year sentences, but they did not move up the minimum eligible parole dates (MEPD) for the X-to-life sentences, with a few minor exceptions. Proposition 57 passed in that year. The state prison department, called the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), subsequently claimed that Prop. 57 authorized it to move up MEPDs via credits, untroubled by the fact that the initiative does not contain a single word about MEPDs.

CJLF and three crime victims filed suit over this and other issues with CDCR’s credit regulations. The Sacramento Superior Court agreed with us regarding MEPDs and issued a writ of mandate to cease early parole hearings and early releases. CDCR appealed, and the writ was stayed pending appeal as to the early hearings but remains in effect as to early releases. Oral argument in CJLF v. CDCR, No. C100274, was heard in the Third District Court of Appeal last Tuesday, May 20.

Assembly Member Ash Kalra is wringing his hands over the murderers and rapists being deprived of their early releases. If he cares anything at all about the victims and their families, he hasn’t shown it. So he took an unrelated bill about prison visitation, amended out all its text, and substituted language that would authorize CDCR to move up MEPDs this way.

The Assembly Public Safety Committee is heavily stacked with soft-on-crime members, but even so this bill just squeaked out with the bare minimum number of votes: 5 on a 9-member committee. The bill was set for its third reading last Monday, the last step before it can be voted on by the full Assembly. It didn’t happen, though, and yesterday the bill received a trivial amendment having to do with evidence in parole hearings.

What’s up with that? This late, trivial amendment creates an exception to the usual June 9 deadline for a bill to pass its house of origin. Perhaps Mr. Kalra is having trouble getting enough votes and is stalling to give himself more time.

Californians who believe that the 15 year minimum for murder should really be a minimum, as the people voted in 1998, should immediately write their Assembly representative and urge a “no” vote on AB 622.