A seismic shift to the right in San Fran? LOL

I guess this is Politicos attempt to run a Babylon Bee style satirical story.

San Fran Mayor London Breed has allowed drugs to be sold openly on the streets.  Does nothing to stop smash and grab criminals and does not push for the arrest of all criminals.  She is running a deficit of over $700 million, shortly to reach one billion dollars.  At the same time, she has closed off streets to cars, making it difficult for downtown, Market Street businesses to get clients and customers.  Her COVID policies has killed off the world famous skyscrapers of San Fran—most losing more than 2/3 of their value—and forcing employees to stay home.

Breed has run the city like a Bolshevik.  Now according to Politico she is a mere Menshevik, hence, going to the right.  Does not matter, San Fran has collapse into a chaotic war zone—ten minutes in town and expect to be mugged or robbed.  Go to the grocery store and expect to see shoplifting and employees not allowed to stop it.

Sad to see Politico trying to compete with Babylon Bee.

A seismic shift to the right in San Francisco

The Democratic mayor is proposing the city require all recipients of county-funded welfare to undergo drug screening.

By DUSTIN GARDINER, Politico,  9/27/23   https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/27/a-seismic-shift-to-the-right-in-san-francisco-00118391

  •  

SAN FRANCISCO — San Francisco Mayor London Breed is apparently doubting voters’ progressive mood so much that she’s banking her reelection on a shift to the right.

The Democratic mayor is proposing the city require all recipients of county-funded welfare to undergo drug screening — and treatment, if needed — in order to be eligible for cash assistance.

Breed defended her proposal during a news conference at City Hall, where she talked about the need to make subsidies contingent on personal responsibility. Progressive critics were quick to compare her comments to Republican welfare policies.

“No more anything goes without accountability. No more handouts without accountability,” Breed said on Tuesday.

It was a striking moment for the mayor of San Francisco, long an ultra-liberal bastion of Democratic politics. It illustrated how homelessness and fentanyl addiction have frustrated residents and upended political norms. Breed has increasingly leaned into tough-on-crime rhetoric in recent months as she faces a growing field of challengers.

Critics framed Breed’s proposal as an expedient shift as she runs for reelection. She announced the effort on the same morning that Daniel Lurie, a nonprofit executive and Levi Strauss heir, announced that he will challenge her in next year’s election.

Lurie, speaking to supporters a few miles away in Potrero Hill, said he would seek to dramatically increase San Francisco’s police force. He vowed to “slam the door shut on the era of open-air drug markets and end the perception that lawlessness is an acceptable part of life in San Francisco.”

Breed also faces a tough road getting the progressive-leaning Board of Supervisors to go along with her proposal. Several were swift to call her plan inhumane and politically motivated.

Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, a progressive and potential rival in the mayoral race, said Breed has failed to work with police to close open-air drug markets. “We need serious ideas, not politicians desperately grasping for a political lifeline.”

The flurry of startled reactions reverberated through San Francisco political circles. Honey Mahogany, chair of the San Francisco Democratic Party and a progressive, framed Breed’s proposal as a political gambit that could push people out of their homes.

“Perhaps she thinks this will differentiate her by moving more to the right,” Mahogany said. “But it might be at the cost of seeing homelessness increase.”

Breed was already facing a mayoral opponent in Ahsha Safaí, a moderate on the Board of Supervisors. Breed is likely to face as much — if not more — incoming criticism from moderates as she does progressives.

Maggie Muir, Breed’s campaign consultant, said the mayor’s proposal is about responding to a crisis, not her reelection strategy. “Whatever the progressives are offering, it’s just not working. People are dying every day on the street,” Muir said.

2 thoughts on “A seismic shift to the right in San Fran? LOL

  1. How entertaining that so many SanFran politicos think they aren’t spending enough or doing enough to enable the drug and crime spree to continue? Lurie might pursue a slightly different path, but if he manages to win, he won’t be able to count on much support from the ‘progressive’ Board of Supervisors, who will block any attempts at restoring some semblance of sanity to SanFran governance. If Caesar, Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan and Hannibal were all to form some sort of coalition government, they couldn’t overcome the rampant stupidity, which has become the hallmark of the city and county of SanFran.

  2. What ever happened to VAGRANCY LAWS? Enforcing clean streets would be a giant step forward in reclaiming the most beautiful City in America. We know what the Democrat Marxist game plan is doing to San Francisco. IT DOES NOT WORK! It never has worked!
    History tells us what happens with conservative governance. Enforce the laws and good things happen. Ignore the laws, denigrate law enforcement and all hell breaks loose.
    SF Voters, you better change your minds.
    California can not print money and dirty Joe is getting close to his “perp” walk.

Comments are closed.