Looks like President Newsom is going have his third chance to appoint a California supreme Court Justice—and his first Chief Justice. If you thought the Court was radical, after this the WOKE crowd will have full control of justice in California—will we be able to tell the difference between this court and the Moscow Supreme Court?
California chief justice won’t seek a second 12-year term
Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye’s announcement will give Gov. Gavin Newsom his third opportunity to appoint a justice to the seven-member court
Mercury News, 7/27/22
SACRAMENTO — The California Supreme Court’s chief justice said Wednesday that she will not seek a second 12-year term in November and will conclude her current term of office on Jan. 1.
The announcement by Chief Justice Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye will give Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, his third opportunity to appoint a justice to the seven-member high court, and his first to pick a new chief justice.
Cantil-Sakauye was sworn in to office in January 2011 after she was nominated by former Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and was elected in the November 2010 general election.
She is the first Asian-Filipina American and the second woman to serve as the state’s chief justice. She said Newsom will be able to select from a diverse pool of qualified successors and that she believes she is leaving the courts “in a solid, sustainable place.”
Cantil-Sakauye told reporters that she is still having anxiety about her decision, but “I’ve accomplished much and started the ball rolling on many things that are of interest to us as a (judicial) branch.”
“It’s just time after 12 years as chief and 32 years total wearing a black robe,” she said.
Unlike U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges, California judges do not hold lifetime positions. She would have had to run for retention by voters in November’s election.
Cantil-Sakauye, 62, made her announcement as the filing deadline is approaching.
She is one of five justices on the seven-member court who could stand for retention in November. At least three of the other four have said they will seek retention.
It could be the largest crowd of justices on any one ballot in more than three decades, according to David Ettinger, an appellate lawyer who writes a blog about the California Supreme Court.
California voters simply vote “yes” or “no” on retaining justices in office, and they don’t run against anyone.
Aside from Cantil-Sakauye, the four associate judges who would have to stand for retention are:
- Justice Martin Jenkins, the first openly gay Black man to the state’s high court. He was appointed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2020 to replace Justice Ming Chin.
- Justice Patricia Guerrero, the first Latina to serve on the California Supreme Court. Newsom appointed her earlier this year to succeed Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar.
- Justice Joshua Groban, who was appointed by then-Gov. Jerry Brown in 2019.
- Justice Goodwin Liu, who was appointed by Brown in 2011.
All but Guerrero have told court officials they plan to seek retention, while Guerrero has made no announcement.
Justices are up for retention in the first gubernatorial election after their appointment, and again if they fill an unexpired term for a previous justice.
Cantil-Sakauye is one of just two remaining justices appointed by a Republican, both by Schwarzenegger, as California continues its shift to the left. The other GOP appointee is Associate Justice Carol Corrigan. The remainder were appointed by Newsom or Brown.
Aside from heading the most populous state’s high court, Cantil-Sakauye also because of her position heads the Judicial Council of California, which is the administrative arm of the state courts, and the Commission on Judicial Appointments that considers governors’ nominees to fill judicial vacancies.
The judicial council received unusual attention during the early months of the coronavirus pandemic when it ordered $0 bail for misdemeanors and lower-level felonies.
By the time the council lifted the order months later, it had reduced jail populations by more than 20,000 suspects. But the council allowed individual counties to keep $0 bail as they saw fit, and some law enforcement officials faulted the practice for contributing to a surge in organized shoplifting, including mass smash-and-grab assaults on stores.
Cantil-Sakauye also supported ending California’s cash bail system, which lawmakers approved until the law was overturned by voters in 2020.
She has otherwise prided herself in presiding over a collegial seven-member court that generally issues unanimous decisions even on controversial cases. She indirectly contrasted the California justices’ good working relationship to the vitriol and distrust on the U.S. Supreme Court particularly since a leak of the high court’s pending abortion decision earlier this year
“Our court is collegial and respectful, and that’s how we are able to trust each other to express our differences of opinion,” she said. “And it is that trust and respect and collegiality … that makes for, I think, why California at the high court operates so well together.”
The daughter of farmworkers, she recalled in a statement that her first exposure to the justice system “was when my family faced eviction from our home and my mother felt helpless.” And as a wife, she said, “I felt the impact of unjust Japanese Internment on my in-laws.”
RELATED ARTICLES
- Why so many supercars in California have Montana license plates
- This California region is suffering from some of the highest inflation in America. Here’s how locals are surviving
- California aims to put EV chargers where drivers need them most
- East Bay council promises to move ahead with rent stabilization
The Sacramento native was appointed to Sacramento Municipal Court by then-Gov. George Deukmejian in 1990 and to the Sacramento County Superior Court by then-Gov. Pete Wilson in 1997, where she created and presided over the county’s first court dedicated to handling domestic violence cases.
Schwarzenegger nominated her for the Third District Court of Appeal in Sacramento in 2005 before tapping her for the Supreme Court to succeed retiring Chief Justice Ronald George.
She is the second female chief justice, after Rose Elizabeth Bird, who served from March 1977 to January 1987 until she was rejected by voters.
Cantil-Sakauye said she has not yet considered her future while she focuses on her months left in office. But she categorically ruled out one option: “There will be no politics in my future.”
