In Los Angeles, up to 25% of the cost of a house or apartment is due to government taxes, fees, permits or regulations that have to do with politics, not safety. Now we have government supporting renters to the detriment of home owners.
“On January 31, 2020, the Alberts scraped together $560,000 in cash and gained title to the property. They have yet to move in.
Despite having pocketed $560,000 and given up title, the original owner refuses to leave. Even under normal circumstances, this would be a problem for the new homeowners because California landlord-tenant laws are so hostile to the landlord. While the former owner isn’t technically a tenant — because there is no lease and no landlord-tenant relationship, and he owes no rent — it’s notoriously difficult to oust even squatters from properties in California.
Unfortunately for the Alberts, they have something worse to contend with than ordinary California law. They’re also fighting the new COVID rules:
[Chris] Taylor [the Alberts’ realtor] says, “It’s genuinely unfathomable to me that we live in a state where something like this is even possible. They closed escrow on this home January 31, 2020.” The Alberts and Taylor have contacted authorities and tried to get the seller evicted but because of the pandemic, they’ve gotten nowhere.
This is the problem with moratoriums on evictions. Worse, this will go on till June, 2021—at the earliest. Then the Alberts will spend about a year in court to get their property back—while receiving no rent money! And, they will never get a dime. The best answer for them is to walk away before they lose even more money.
California homebuyers discover that the government is their enemy
By Andrea Widburg, American Thinker, 3/21/21
A nightmare facing a couple who purchased a home for cash perfectly illustrates why having the government over-involved in the rental market is a disaster even for people who never meant to lease their property but are plagued by a squatter. A couple who bought a house in good faith now find themselves mired in California’s labyrinthine tenants’ laws, exacerbated by the new COVID rules.
Riverside is a large suburban area located about 50 miles east of downtown Los Angeles — although it’s still considered part of the Greater Los Angeles area. Tracie and Myles Albert, a young couple in Riverside, found what they thought was the perfect home: a four-bedroom that they could buy quickly, for cash.
On January 31, 2020, the Alberts scraped together $560,000 in cash and gained title to the property. They have yet to move in.
Despite having pocketed $560,000 and given up title, the original owner refuses to leave. Even under normal circumstances, this would be a problem for the new homeowners because California landlord-tenant laws are so hostile to the landlord. While the former owner isn’t technically a tenant — because there is no lease and no landlord-tenant relationship, and he owes no rent — it’s notoriously difficult to oust even squatters from properties in California.
Unfortunately for the Alberts, they have something worse to contend with than ordinary California law. They’re also fighting the new COVID rules:
[Chris] Taylor [the Alberts’ realtor] says, “It’s genuinely unfathomable to me that we live in a state where something like this is even possible. They closed escrow on this home January 31, 2020.” The Alberts and Taylor have contacted authorities and tried to get the seller evicted but because of the pandemic, they’ve gotten nowhere.
“They have this case under a COVID tenant situation, of no evictions when it doesn’t fall under that at all. This transaction went through in January 2020 before any of that, it isn’t a renter who was getting thrown out. It’s the guy who collected all of this money,” stated Myles.
What’s happening to the Alberts isn’t unique. According to an eviction attorney, Dennis Block, “[t]his year alone, we’ve handled at least 7, maybe 8, cases of this exact type of situation.”
The Alberts’ experience is more than just a human interest story about one couple’s nightmare real estate experience. It’s also a warning about the future that the Democrats have planned for property owners across America.
Just last week, American Thinker published Anony Mee’s essay about Ilhan Omar’s draft bill, H.R. 1847, which is meant to throw landlords to the wolves, at which point the government will essentially take over rental property in America. As the Alberts’ nightmare shows, once you have leftists in charge, anyone who is occupying a property, whether renting or squatting, is treated as a tenant. The California model will become the national system if Omar’s bill becomes law.
And if you’re a tenant and think, “Well, this might be good for me,” disabuse yourself of that notion. Two things happen when the government takes control of rental properties through overwhelmingly pro-tenant laws.
First, the amount of available housing stock shrinks because there is no incentive for anyone to become a landlord.
Second, those properties that do remain on the market are invariably in horrific condition. This is because (a) there’s heavy competition for the few available properties, so there’s no incentive for landlords to improve the property and (b) because landlords are subject to rent control and may find it almost impossible to evict people for non-payment, they don’t have funds for property improvements.
It gets worse when the government is the landlord. Just think of every horrible housing project or Section 8 community built in America in the 1960s and 1970s. Every one of them became a crime-ridden hellhole.
No matter where you live, even if your representative is a Republican, you must speak up about H.R. 1847, to make very sure it doesn’t pass. Remember: Republicans tend to be squishes, and their leftist colleagues can bully them into voting for stupid things. You need to get there first.
