I am not sure if this is very good news or terrible news—but it does explain why Newsom needs to be Recalled—and the Sacramento Democrats sent home.
“As much as the state’s welcome mat is rolled out, refugees working with the U.S. Department of State won’t generally get a federal blessing to make the Golden State their new home.
The department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs listed the cities it said are best suited for refugees to thrive. Despite significant Afghan population centers in Sacramento and Fremont, where one neighborhood is called Little Kabul, no California destinations are on the list of 19 cities.
The bureau said the District of Columbia metro area and some cities in California are “very expensive places to live,” making it difficult to find reasonable housing and employment.
“Any resettlement benefits you receive may not comfortably cover the cost of living in these areas,” the bureau’s resettlement guidance said. “Unless you have close relatives or friends in these areas who are able to provide financial support and housing until you find employment that covers your living expenses, it is best to allow a resettlement agency to choose a suitable location for you.”
Even with giveaways and Federal government largesse, and a welcoming mat form Newsom, California is too expensive for refugees—actually, it is too expensive for most that live here. That is why families and businesses are leaving.
Feds say California too expensive to welcome Afghan refugees
By Cole Lauterbach | The Center Square, 9/6/21
(The Center Square) – Afghan refugees looking to resettle in the U.S. are being discouraged from picking California as a destination, despite the state having significant Afghan population centers.
In the days after the U.S. announced it would resettle refugees fleeing a Taliban takeover of Afghanistan, governors across the country made statements welcoming refugees.
“We’re a state of refuge,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Aug. 16 during a news conference. “I’m proud of the fact that, over the last decade, California’s taken in more refugees than any other state in America, and I’m proud of the fact a disproportionate number of Afghani refugees are here in Northern California, not just here in the south, but also up in Sacramento County.”
Newsom said the state already was working with nonprofit organizations to “make sure that they feel welcome and celebrated as members of our community.”
As much as the state’s welcome mat is rolled out, refugees working with the U.S. Department of State won’t generally get a federal blessing to make the Golden State their new home.
The department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs listed the cities it said are best suited for refugees to thrive. Despite significant Afghan population centers in Sacramento and Fremont, where one neighborhood is called Little Kabul, no California destinations are on the list of 19 cities.
The bureau said the District of Columbia metro area and some cities in California are “very expensive places to live,” making it difficult to find reasonable housing and employment.
“Any resettlement benefits you receive may not comfortably cover the cost of living in these areas,” the bureau’s resettlement guidance said. “Unless you have close relatives or friends in these areas who are able to provide financial support and housing until you find employment that covers your living expenses, it is best to allow a resettlement agency to choose a suitable location for you.”
California’s cost of living likely is to be a significant hurdle for refugees looking to make the state their home. Refugees receive a $1,100 stipend for three months after arriving in the country. According to RentCafe, the median rent in Fremont is more than $2,400 a month.
“With the recent victories for pro-housing policy in our state legislature, California is finally grappling with five decades of resistance to building more homes in our cities,” said Matthew Lewis, director of communications for California YIMBY, a nonprofit that advocates for policies that would allow more housing availability in California. “Sadly, that won’t help today’s refugees, whether they’re fleeing war in Afghanistan or wildfires right here in the Sierra Nevada.”
Lewis, however, stressed not to count California out.
“The vast majority of Californians want to make it legal to build more affordable homes in our cities, and we’re optimistic that our cities will be more welcoming in the very near future – for refugees, immigrants, Americans seeking opportunity, and for our own children,” he said.
According to the CATO Institute, California is home to an estimated 45% of the nation’s Afghan population.
UPDATE: The bureau removed the list of 19 cities from its resettlement page over the weekend. A State Department spokesperson said the change was to “maximize potential placement options and flexibility” and would eventually use the list again once the placement process becomes more normalized. The official maintains that the list was for refugees to self-select a place to resettle should they not have close ties in the U.S.
In the meantime, the bureau would continue working with its nine resettlement partners and affiliates across the country to resettle refugees, they said.
