This is a very misleading headline. It makes it appear that conservatives wanting honest elections are the bad guys. And, those that support corrupt elections are the good guys. Headline reads, “New California voter ID ban puts conservative cities at odds with state” It is the State that prefers corrupt elections.
“Supporters believe that mandatory voter identification, a popular policy in Republican states, can address growing public concerns about election integrity following Trump’s false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. But other than when new voters register, Democrats in California have resisted ID requirements, which they argue disenfranchise young, low-income, disabled and nonwhite voters without providing any real benefit because there is not widespread election fraud.
State officials contend that requiring voter ID is already illegal in California because of a provision in the election code that prohibits “mass, indiscriminate, and groundless challenging of voters solely for the purpose of preventing voters from voting.” Lawmakers passed the ban this summer anyway — which Min said would clarify any potential ambiguities around elections where only local issues are on the ballot — part of a string of bills to crack down on local conservative rebellions.”
Read that carefully. Democrats believe having honest elections is discriminatory. If anyone can get a library card, a drivers license—are those discriminatory? This article is propaganda for those who prefer dishonest elections and a UniParty running the State. Why not stop pretending and just elections?
New California voter ID ban puts conservative cities at odds with state
by Alexei Koseff, CalMatters, 12/20/24 https://calmatters.org/politics/elections/2024/12/california-voters-identification-new-laws-2025/
In summary
A new law prohibits local governments from mandating voter identification, but Huntington Beach is fighting back.
California has become the latest battleground over voter identification requirements, a longtime conservative priority newly propelled in recent years by election fraud complaints from President-elect Donald Trump.
Under a state law that takes effect on Jan. 1, local governments across California will be prohibited from compelling voters to present identification to cast a ballot in an election.
Dave Min, an Irvine Democrat just elected to Congress, took up the ban this year as a state senator after Huntington Beach voters in March adopted a charter amendment allowing the city to require ID in its municipal elections. That measure — which takes effect in 2026, and also grants the city authority to add more in-person voting locations and monitor ballot drop-boxes — was part of a broader push by local leaders to make Huntington Beach a bulwark of resistance against California’s liberal governance.
Supporters believe that mandatory voter identification, a popular policy in Republican states, can address growing public concerns about election integrity following Trump’s false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. But other than when new voters register, Democrats in California have resisted ID requirements, which they argue disenfranchise young, low-income, disabled and nonwhite voters without providing any real benefit because there is not widespread election fraud.
State officials contend that requiring voter ID is already illegal in California because of a provision in the election code that prohibits “mass, indiscriminate, and groundless challenging of voters solely for the purpose of preventing voters from voting.” Lawmakers passed the ban this summer anyway — which Min said would clarify any potential ambiguities around elections where only local issues are on the ballot — part of a string of bills to crack down on local conservative rebellions.
The issue is already in court. Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber sued Huntington Beach in April, seeking to invalidate its newly approved charter amendment for interfering with state protections of voting rights. Huntington Beach officials counter that, as a charter city, they have broad discretion to set their own rules for municipal governance, including election management.
An Orange County judge dismissed that lawsuit in November, without addressing the merits of the policy, concluding that because the charter amendment is discretionary and the city has yet to implement it, it “currently presents no conflict with state elections law.”
But Bonta and Weber, who called Huntington Beach’s voter ID requirement “a solution in search of a problem,” plan to appeal. Meanwhile, a legal challenge against the new ban may be coming soon from the city.
If there is no voter fraud, what is the problem? The rest of the agreement is BS