The National Federation of Republican Women leadership has the same mentality of the new Supreme Court Justice, appointed by Joe Biden, Ketanji Brown Jackson, who famously said, “I can not define what a women is.” It seems the NFRW President is in the same boat, she does not want to define what a women is.
At the NFRW convention in Oklahoma City, in a couple of weeks, will she also ask for a name change, to meet her scientific illiteracy? The proposed new name? The National Federation of Republican Whatevers.
Most every member of the Republican Women’s Fed, in California and nationally that I know, agree with Riley Gaines that men do not belong in a women’s bathroom, sorority house or as a competitor in sports. Yet, Gaines has now denounced the NFRW.
“Riley Gaines, for example. Standing up for truth is always the right thing to do, and conservatives should do so no matter what the cost.
Its national leadership has rejected a proposed bylaws amendment for consideration at the organization’s upcoming biennial conference in Oklahoma City later this month. The bylaws proposal, published in full below, effectively would bar gender-confused men living as “trans women” from joining the NFRW as voting members and leaders.”
Gaines is a hero to most women—but apparently she is not a fan of the “new” National Federation of Republican Whatevers’.
Riley Gaines and others call out Republican Women’s group for failing to affirm womanhood
justmindy, Twitchy, 9/6/23 https://twitchy.com/justmindy/2023/09/06/national-federation-of-republican-women-what-is-a-woman-n2386899#google_vignette
Republicans tend to mock Democrats about their inability to answer the question ‘what is a woman?’, however, it appears one Republican group is similarly struggling with this question.
Well, yes, standing up for what is right is often difficult and sometimes very expensive. Ask Riley Gaines, for example. Standing up for truth is always the right thing to do, and conservatives should do so no matter what the cost.
Its national leadership has rejected a proposed bylaws amendment for consideration at the organization’s upcoming biennial conference in Oklahoma City later this month. The bylaws proposal, published in full below, effectively would bar gender-confused men living as “trans women” from joining the NFRW as voting members and leaders.
But NFRW’s national president, Eileen Sobjack, on advice from the organization’s attorney, reportedly fears a costly lawsuit and told state leaders that “addressing this issue would end us. I will not let this issue be our demise,” WND has learned from a source within the organization requesting anonymity. Sobjack was “unavailable” for comment on this story, according to an aide.
Laura Carlson, the Iowa woman leading the effort to get the NFRW to align with a very popular GOP and women’s cause – defending real women’s spaces from being infiltrated by trans faux women – says she and her allies would be willing to raise the money necessary to pay for any legal challenge. The upstart movement is pressing ahead and hoping for a convention debate on the topic.
Recommended
That’s the spirit. If we are sick of these organizations not accurately reflecting the true feelings of actual Republicans, it’s time to get involved.
Riley is on the scene, now. She will not allow them to cower.
Now, the group knows finding legal defense will not be a problem. They are all out of excuses. It will be interesting to watch their next moves.
A strong state/national organization is very important as are independent clubs. Whatever decision the National Federation of Republican Women (NFRW) makes, it will anger some people. So, why not decide for WOMEN and against woke?
I think you are all, including you Steve, are misunderstanding. To quote “The bylaws proposal, effectively would bar gender-confused men living as “trans women” from joining the NFRW as voting members and leaders.” In plain english, the NFRW will not allow confused men who think they are women into the organization as members. Men who want to belong to our organization may do so as an associate member with no voting power or right to hold any office. We do know who a WOMEN is and it biological, no question!
It has always be our goal to empower women from all backgrounds to become leaders in the political process and it provides a forum for WOMEN to serve in the political, government and civic arenas. We inform and educate people. We NFRW WOMEN are the largest grassroots Republican Women’s organization in our country. And we WOMEN are proud to be an Women’s organization.
The only thing NFRW and CFRW care about is their Bylaws! What do they do for Republican candidates??
Yeah but keep
Your standards high!!!!
All NFRW and CFRW need to do is put in bylaws only biological women may be full members. All others may be associate members. By discriminating against men being members for years now they could have been subject to lawsuit as federal law made the Elks clubs a male only organization and others include women as members or get sued. So by not allowing men at all to be members may be already against the federal law. Just put in bylaws “only biological women”. That’s all need to do. If get sued then collect the money to pay for lawyers. Otherwise the biological women clubs will be run over by transgender males. And all will lose.
Looks like we have another Republican insulting and working against other Republicans. Does she think attacking other Republicans (in any way) is going to increase her votes or popularity. Suddenly, I do not like this candidate. She should spend her time shooting arrows at Demoncrats instead of a group working to advance our party. I guess she is to young to recall Reagan’s rule.
Riley isn’t attacking Republicans. She is asking that NFRW uphold a principle. That should be admired. Even Republicans can wander off the path. If Republicans don’t remain clearly conservative, then it will be the end of a 2-party system.
Because there’s already trans men who pretend to be women. Gina and that other one. They were nice and I was respectful but its just wrong. As adults they can do whatever they’d like but I don’t have to agree.