Looks like the clueless San Fran Mayor Breed is realizing that incentives can be used to get drug addicts off the streets.
“San Francisco Mayor London Breed proposed new legislation Tuesday that would require people with substance use disorders to seek treatment before the city provides them financial support.
As part of an effort to forcefully steer people into addiction treatment, Breed said the city’s General Assistance program—considered a safety net for people who don’t qualify for other means of financial support—would start screening its participants for addiction under the legislation. Those who fail the screening would no longer receive financial support unless they enroll in treatment.”
The same concept could be used to stop illegal aliens from using tax dollars for their immigration violations.
San Francisco Drug Users Must Enter Treatment Before Receiving Cash Assistance: Mayor
Written by David Sjostedt, SF Standard, 9/26/23 https://sfstandard.com/2023/09/26/mayor-halts-cash-for-drug-users/
San Francisco Mayor London Breed proposed new legislation Tuesday that would require people with substance use disorders to seek treatment before the city provides them financial support.
As part of an effort to forcefully steer people into addiction treatment, Breed said the city’s General Assistance program—considered a safety net for people who don’t qualify for other means of financial support—would start screening its participants for addiction under the legislation. Those who fail the screening would no longer receive financial support unless they enroll in treatment.
San Francisco’s General Assistance program administered $30.3 million in fiscal year 2022. There are roughly 5,200 people currently in the program.
“No more handouts without accountability,” Breed said at a press conference Tuesday.
Through the General Assistance program, housed participants can receive a maximum of $687 per month, while those who are homeless receive a maximum of $105 per month along with a guaranteed shelter bed due to the Care Not Cash legislation passed in 2002.
Program participants with children would not be included under the new legislation.
Trent Rhorer, executive director of the Human Services Agency, said the share of people with substance use disorders among people who receive these benefits is higher than among the general population.
A man living in the SoMa neighborhood named Gabriel Waller, who said he has colon cancer and is addicted to fentanyl, said he was denied from the city’s General Assistance program. The lack of money hasn’t deterred him from finding other means to obtain drugs, he said.
“Screw the drugs, I’ve been begging for something to drink since like four o clock,” Waller said as he swept tin foil he had smoked fentanyl from off his lap. “Maybe [Breed] needs to feel what I’m feeling right now. My throat is so parched.”
Another man named Andrew Hotchkiss-Carrigan, who said he’d been intermittently living on the streets, speculated that the legislation would lead more people to commit crimes to support their addictions.
Critics of the city’s drug treatment system have said voluntary treatment isn’t widely available or accessible enough for people with addiction. On the morning of Breed’s announcement, a city dashboard showed eight beds available for publicly funded detox programs, which serve as the first step for many people seeking recovery.
Admissions to drug treatment in San Francisco have declined by 37% between 2015 and 2021, and fatal overdoses are occurring at a record pace this year, with 84 people dying in August alone, according to preliminary data.
The Department of Public Health has said the decline in treatment admissions doesn’t necessarily correspond with fewer people starting treatment since the city has increased prescriptions for medically assisted treatment.
However, the department has also said changes in the state’s public insurance system have restricted the city from providing drug treatment for out-of-town patients in recent years.
Breed’s proposed law will be heard by the Board of Supervisors.
Another useless program that will be designed with abuse, cost taxpayers a lot of money with very little results. From time to time, they will spotlight an achievement to attempt to gain attention and public acceptance, but it is just another scheme to reward a few people with unrealistic compensation.
Now SF can claim more dollars from Feds et al by PRing its humanitarian stance. BUT, the real gimmick is obvious: there will be so few people using the funded operation that SF will SAVE big bucks. Thus, the problem will fester into the 22nd Century. Cute SF. Feed off of taxpayers elsewhere, its a narcotized habit with San Francisco, CA.
Breed’s stance, what could have been a ‘good start’ towards dealing with the TRUE problem of homelessness — bums and junkies — has earned her extreme venom from the most outspoken of her critics and elevates the challengers for her job. SF will soon elect a new Mayor–all choices are more left wing than Breed. Everything collapses on top of a person who, having some power, attempts to do the right thing.
Case in point: Elon Musk.
Perhaps the Breed idea should be tried with the State’s Housing First laws. No more housing if you are a drug addict. Detox first. Putting druggies into apartments next to non-druggies, with children, just makes situation worse. Restore the rules that you can’t smoke, drink or do drugs in public housing.