This is from an article on the Internet: “The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) is facing a significant budget deficit, specifically $114 million for the 2025-26 school year. This deficit is primarily due to a combination of declining enrollment trends, reduced state funding, and rising expenditures. To address this, SFUSD is implementing a multi-pronged strategy, including staffing cuts, central office reductions, and a new payroll system.”
At the same time, they have a $114 million deficit, they are spending $105 million on housing—not an educational expenditure. They could have saved that money, plus, sold the excess property and NOT have a deficit. Instead, they are turning the district into a land developer, away from education. The Feds should not give a dime to this district, if they have money to build home, they have money for education. Or is this corruption?
San Francisco’s School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That’s Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.
By Diana Ionescu, Planetizen, 6/8/25 https://www.planetizen.com/news/2025/06/135219-san-franciscos-school-district-spent-105m-build-affordable-housing-teachers-and
The San Francisco Unified School District opened its first affordable housing development, Shirley Chisholm Village, “a 135-unit housing complex in San Francisco’s oceanside Sunset District. Built on district-owned land, with affordable rents and preference given to SFUSD educators.”
As Nate Berg explains in Fast Company, “The $105 million project was developed by the nonprofit MidPen Housing with a design by San Francisco-based BAR Architects & Interiors in association with G7A | Gonzales Architects, and in coordination with the San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development.”
The units are reserved for residents who make between 30 and 100 percent of the area median income and represent a growing movement by school districts to use their resources to provide workforce housing for educators and district employees. The district has three additional housing projects in the works.
The building includes a fifth floor work-from-home area and gathering space separate from the private living spaces. “Though the project was not required to include parking under the city’s zoning code, the developers chose to include some underground spaces, partly to assuage neighborhood concerns about street parking and partly at the request of the educators who helped guide the design process.”
Prior to the housing development, the lot was vacant, with the community using it as a park. To address the loss of this communal space, the development includes a public plaza, playground, and seating area accessible from the street.
The District does no know how to educate any more so they are trying their hand at real estate. Probably a good thing. Why keep spending money on students who don’t give a rat’sa_s about learning and parents who don.t give a damn!